@Vygantas
Do not talk security when you are just skimming details.
1) IE is not included in data you provide. Do not make recommendations based on missing data.
2) You do not weight risk of vulnerabilities. Having dozens of dozens of peaty problems is favourable to having just one that is extremely dangerous. And do not make recommendations based on missing data.
3) Time to patch is not specified either. Its better to have dozens of vulnerabilities than to have one of same level of risk that is not patched for full year. And do not make recommendations based on missing data.
4) Secunia did not disclosed what they considered vulnerability.. Did they count 64/32 as separate or as same vulnerability? What they counted? Only vendor confirmed information or 3rd party reports? Did they check reports (to see if vendor/3rd party do not put multiple vulnerabilities in one basket?). Did they make sure that data from different sources is normalized? And do not make recommendations based on missing data!!!
PS No I have no real reservations about data provided by Secunia. I just do not understand ignorant people who like to jump to conclusions if math is easy, and will not in any event stop to consider if real world is a bit more complicated..